I’ve been meaning to get this off of my chest and it really has been bugging me, there are a couple of major misconceptions floating around the blogosphere and it is REALLY beginning to tick me off.
1. The offshore industry are not crooks.
If they weren’t there your taxes would be much higher. Yes I know you read stories from the net about how “unfair” it is that they don’t pay their taxes in their home domicile, but why should you worry about propping up government innefficiency in another country? If they really want to shift those companies back onshore they should lower their taxes. The use of “offshore” jurisdictions is an accepted part of day to day life in the financial services industry. Just ask those banks in exotic locations like Vermont for their opinion.
2. A lawsuit is not proof of being guilty!
Being sued in a civil suit is not proof of guilt, in fact being sued in a civil suit is not proof of anything! In fact its common practice by lawyers to spread their lawsuit as far and as wide as possible. Up to and including suing the secretary who accepted the letter for her boss that might have contained the information that might be pertinent to the suit if the planets align the right way next Thursday. Thats how you get things like the Kingsland suit.
3. Just because the BLP/DLP said it, doesn’t mean that it’s not a good idea!
Come on! the number of partisan hacks that we have on line who disconnect any sense of intelligence from any facts is amazing. We’ve actually had people claim that Owen Arthur is infalible, that all of the development in the tourism industry occurred during Peter Morgan’s days forty years ago, and the list of absurdities goes on. And by the way, our pointing out flaws in your arguments is not proof of supporting the other side, we just aren’t supporting YOU.
4. The fact that you didn’t know about it, doesn’t mean that it’s a secret!
Let’s face it none of us know everything, but not knowing about something doesn’t mean that there is a great secret conspiracy to keep it hidden from the light of day!
5. Resorting to insults and invective are not only childish but you make the other persons point for them.
In case you haven’t noticed that’s why they leave those comments on the comment board, jackass!
6. Laws for defamation are not a bad thing (per se) !
They are supposed to stop people from publishing crap about people and rubbishing their reputations. Without them there would be no obligation to do even the slightest reserarch before publishing. (Oh, I’m sorry we are already in those circumstances in Bajan Blogworld.)
7. The more you allow party hacks to go unchallenged the more you undermine the credibility of your blog/media.
Starcom Networks gets this, just ask David Ellis. I’m not saying they shouldn’t be allowed to comment but certainly the blog owner should challenge all blatantly partisan opinions. Allow them free rein at the expense of your credibility. (Sorry, once again something we don’t worry about in the blogosphere)
8. The more you become a forum for the silly and the absurd the less the mainstream will pay attention to you.
Let’s face it the blogs no longer have the political force they had 3 months ago. They are no longer seen as “voices of the people” they are becoming part of an entertaining lunatic fringe that can be safely ignored. We in the blogoshpere are poorer for it.
I’m sure this post won’t be popular, and will upset more than a few people, but I feel much better for getting that off of my chest.
Let the fireworks begin!